[Nordskogen] Accessible Helpful Support was demos -
Gwen Trevirensis
gwen.trevirensis at gmail.com
Wed Jul 19 08:47:04 CDT 2006
Yes, Giovanna's post should have been prefaced by "in my opinion" because it
came across that it was a decree. I have met some really nice people here,
but I have to say I have run into some of the nastiest people I have ever
run into in the SCA here as well....and that's 20 years folks. So maybe
instead of worrying about becoming better on the outside, some of the people
in this Barony need to work on becoming better on the inside. No amount of
expensive fabric is going to make a nasty person look good or make a good
impression.
Victory is fleeting. Just remember that a title CAN be taken away, just as
easily as it is gained. A certain baron in Bright Hills lost his title
because of his behaviour.
Gwen
On 7/18/06, A. B. <nasionnaich at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> I have been keeping up on the doings of the Barony and the SCA in
> general, even though I have not attended any meetings or events for
> quite some time. I have been following this "discussion", and I feel
> that it is time I speak out on this subject. I am going to be blunt,
> and I make no apologies for doing so. If you don't want to "hear" what
> I have to say, just hit the "delete" button right now and you will not
> have to worry about being offended.
>
> Thank you Devin (Brenda) and Iriye (Elizabeth), for stating what I was
> trying to say to people last year (and it seemed to fall on mostly
> deaf ears then). Not everyone has oodles of money available to spend
> on the SCA. Not everyone has oodles of time to do SCA things. Some
> people have enough trouble just getting by while indulging their need
> for interests outside of the home. Those who do have lots of time and
> money, good for you -- but PLEASE do not expect everyone else to
> participate and or be as authentic at all times as yourselves. There
> really are people who truly wish to be a part of the SCA, yet are not
> able to shine nearly as brightly as those in the "Inner Circle".
>
> I was helping to set up a Court one night at a weekily meeting (it was
> a Folkmoot night), when one of the "Royalty" snapped that she wasn't
> helpless, goddammit, she could do things for herself. I was made to
> feel, whether intentionally or not, that my help was very much NOT
> welcome. Things like this do not make people want to volunteer very
> much at all, because what's the point of volunteering when you will
> not be thanked for it anyway.
>
> And when ANYONE in ANY position of Authority even implies that
> something just has to be done "this way and not that way", it really
> DOES come across as being a "Royal Decree". Even when the implied
> "decree" is just a suggestion. Those of you who are in such positions
> of Authority should wait before hitting that "send" button and read
> what you have written, just to see if there is any possible way your
> message can be misunderstood -- no matter how good your intentions may
> be. I hope we all know what the road to H*** is paved with.
>
> Hopefully, now some people will see at least one of the reasons why I
> decided to take some time away from active participation in the SCA
> and leave all of the petty bickering and politics which seem to have
> become such an integral part of the SCA. Real Life -- "Mundania" --
> should have more than enough politics for everyone. And by "politics"
> I mean the practice (whether conciously or subconciously) of snubbing
> others because their "kit" isn't "good enough" or other such things.
> ---Artúr Dúbh Mac a'Gobhaínn
> ______________________________________________________________
>
> From: "Elizabeth Chase" <elizabethlchase at msn.com>
> Reply-To: The Hall of Nordskogen
> <nordskogen at nordskogen.northshield.org>
> To: "The Hall of Nordskogen"
> <nordskogen at nordskogen.northshield.org>
> Subject: [Nordskogen] Accessible Helpful Support was demos -
> Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 02:42:59 -0500
> I have a suggestion...... how about changing this thread to 'how
> helpful can we be'? Attempts like this at some kind of
> mediation make me grind me teeth. I agree that in substance, there
> was no 'decree of authenticity' concretely stated..... however,
> as in all forms of communication, the effect on the recipients is
> what is important.... if they feel that the decree is there, then
> it is implied.
> snip............snip
>
> .
> Leaders, intentionally or not, defacto or implied, set the example.
> We need to quit telling other people what fish to eat and start
> teaching them how to fish for themselves. Individually, hand to
> hand..... They will teach someone else how to fish......
> ... or so the story goes......
> Anyway, one more stir of the spoon......
> Iriye
> (who is secretly hoping to just get folks thinking)
> _______________________________________________
> Nordskogen mailing list
> Nordskogen at nordskogen.northshield.org
> http://mailman.nordskogen.northshield.org/listinfo/nordskogen
>
More information about the Nordskogen
mailing list